In fact I have both in my workshop.Īlso a comment about Modo and manufacturing. So I’d say it is cool to have both - they complement each other nicely. On top of that it also has a very good render engine. Oh, and trust me, after a while of working inside Modo you’ll quickly start to miss things like fallofs in other apps.
Modo will work amazingly well if you want to work on the more organic stuff, with some local detail or tweak items. Rhino works great with more technical items, building basic shapes, or flowing shapes without huge amount of local detail. Not a week goes by that Blender doesn’t announce some new functionality equal or better than the expensive programs.Īs other mentioned it is not a good idea to compare the two - different beasts. Rhino on the other hand can do only very basic animations - it’s not the sort of tool that you’re going to use to make your shampoo bottle morph into a smile.Īnd, as joddys says, don’t forget about Blender. The geometry that modo creates isn’t useful in the fabrication process and it has no annotations (dimensions, labels, etc.). As has been said before, they’re very different tools that address different needs of the design and fabrication process.
#MODO SOFTWARE TV#
But if your mandate is to provide product shots and a simple TV animation showing the shampoo bottle twirling up into the air, breaking out into a smile and then blowing some bubbles - modo. If your client wants a design ready for fabrication with all the technical data required - Rhino. The way I look at it is like this - you have a client who wants a design for a shampoo bottle (think graceful curves, caps, tapering geometry, etc.).
0 kommentar(er)
